Not really anything new, Apple is just making non- crAppStore app installation slightly less convent then it already was:
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/08 ... pp-checks/
If we are going to continue to release OXT on Apple Desktops then maybe it's time we should to subscribe to an Apple developer account (which it seems still costs $100/year) so that we can get OXT distributions Sign and Notarize?
I don't know if there's any other advantages to having a paid Dev account with Apple.
...or we could just stick with providing instructions for installing using GateKeeper exceptions method.
macos-15-sequoia, now more annoying to indy devs then ever before!
- OpenXTalkPaul
- Posts: 2588
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:19 pm
- Contact:
- tperry2x
- Posts: 3115
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:10 pm
- Location: Somewhere in deepest darkest Norfolk, England
- Contact:
Re: macos-15-sequoia, now more annoying to indy devs then ever before!
There's a comment on that site that I couldn't agree more with. Exactly this:
-
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:37 pm
- Contact:
Re: macos-15-sequoia, now more annoying to indy devs then ever before!
Apple, like the rest of the world, is powered in large part by Open Source infrastructure. They've had a booth at the SoCal Linux Expo to hire Linux admins. iCloud is a series of Linux farms. The Darwin kernel is Free.
But the parts in between evidence an uncomfortable balance-seeking between industry-standard tooling and value extraction.
Note the version of rsync that still ships with macOS, for example.
But the parts in between evidence an uncomfortable balance-seeking between industry-standard tooling and value extraction.
Note the version of rsync that still ships with macOS, for example.
- OpenXTalkPaul
- Posts: 2588
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2021 4:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: macos-15-sequoia, now more annoying to indy devs then ever before!
Ugh, now I read this, another annoying and end-user-scaring monthly message if your app uses screenshots or does screen or microphone recording.
https://www.macworld.com/article/242920 ... -apps.html
I get why user authorizing an app for that is needed, at least once, for security, but that message doesn't need to be as scary as it is.
https://www.macworld.com/article/242920 ... -apps.html
I get why user authorizing an app for that is needed, at least once, for security, but that message doesn't need to be as scary as it is.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests